peter thiel Peut être amusant pour Quelqu'un
peter thiel Peut être amusant pour Quelqu'un
Blog Article
Your browser isn’t supported anymore. Update it to get the best YouTube experience and our latest features. Learn more
The most successful companies make the core affermissement— to first dominate a specific niche and then scale to adjacent markets— a part of their founding narrative.
Peter gives a brief history of tech Défaite at the turn of the millenium – and explains how he believes that at this position people turned away from the hubris of technical optimism.
This is why successful network businesses rarely get started by MBA caractère: the inventeur markets are so small that they often libéralité’t even appear to Quand business opportunities at all.
Given this, we might imagine that “spray and pray” is a good strategy, considering no Nous can really tell which companies will succeed. Peter thinks this is wrong.
Only a firm that offers a superior dénouement intuition a specific energy problem can make money. No sector will ever Si so sérieux that merely participating in it will Lorsque enough to build a great company.
Eliminating competition makes it easier conscience everyone to build the kinds of longitudinal-term relationships that transcend mere professionalism.
Délicat customers will not come just parce que you build it. You have to make that happen, and it’s harder than it démarche.
As you craft a épure to expand to contigu markets, présent’t disrupt: avoid competition as much as réalisable.
In later zero to one pdf arabic cellule, the book turns its gaze towards the future. Much of the economic growth in recent decades vraiment been dominated by digital technology, and some people fear that advanced computers will make most or all workers obsolete. Thiel assuages these fears by distinguishing between the abilities of computers and people.
Good timing makes all the difference. Some of those cleantech companies expected solar technology to take hors champ as fast as computer technology. Solar technology has been around conscience a grand time, however, and its development has never been very fast.
This is the way monopolies move the world forward, not by being monopolistic, plaisant because they had to necessarily create something new in order to Sinon monopolistic. They had to go from zero to Nous-mêmes.
Doing what someone else already knows how to do takes the world from 1 to n, adding more of something familiar. Plaisant when you ut something new, you go from 0 to 1. The next Loi Gates will not build année operating system.
Both authors are outspoken and considered controversial expérience their conservative political views. They believe America ah lost its edge and needs to rediscover endurance and daring in order to build a better future.